News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Chlorine is the only option for Busselton water 

Chlorine is the only option for Busselton water

10 Mar, 2010 03:35 PM
THE decision to chlorinate Busselton Water has already sparked a backlash in the community.

However, Busselton Water chiefs insist it is necessary, saying it is only a matter of time before the 300km network of pipes, servicing around 10,000 customers, create health problems.

And the Department of Health supports the decision.

“The implementation of chlorine is to manage the risk of the growing reticulation system,” Busselton Water chairman David Reid and CEO Keith White said in a joint statement.

“While the quality of water is as good as it ever was, the potential problem is within the growing network of pipes,” Mr Reid added.

“While we have not detected any serious health risk to date, professional advice suggests that the board cannot risk the community’s health.”

It is proposed to treat the water supply with chlorine in the next 12 months.

“It is our only option for a long-term solution,” Mr Reid said.

“Busselton Water has almost 300km of mains, which are increasing each year. Larger water volumes and satellite subdivisions are leading to a significant increase in the risk of harmful organism within the growing network.

“In October 2008 the board commissioned an investigation into Busselton Water’s disinfection system. Last month the board considered the final of a series of reports, which had five options.

“It found that as a result of our growing reticulation network that Busselton’s water was at risk of developing a water quality problem and because of that the board has made the decision to implement full-time chlorination.

“Currently water is treated through an ultraviolet (UV) disinfection process as it leaves the water treatment plant. This means that there is no residual disinfectant in the distribution network.

“None of the five options provided an adequate residual disinfection barrier, except full-time chlorination.

“The quality of the extracted water is as good as it ever was. The potential problem is within the growing network of pipes.

“In essence it is not the water but the pipes that require chlorination, due to their length

“When chlorine is administered in the correct dosage it can be difficult to detect.”

The Department of Health told Busselton Water that the growth of Busselton had changed the water distribution system.

“It is now likely that the water will be held in distribution mains for extended periods of time and in some areas it is possible for water to circulate around the network. As growth continues the increased complexity of the distribution system will place additional pressure on the integrity and safety of your community’s drinking water supply,” it said.

“The most commonly used disinfection system used around the world, including Australia, is chlorine. Chlorine provides the most lasting and effective protection from the treatment plant to the customer’s tap.

“This protection is particularly important in Western Australia where long pipelines and high water temperatures create the potential for the growth of harmful micro-organisms within the distribution system.

“The Department of Health supports and requires the use of chlorine or an equivalent residual drinking water disinfectant in all complex drinking water distribution systems.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Napier, in NZ, derives its town water from an aquifer 40m deep. It has 400km of mains lines with an annual consumption of 10,500,000m3. The water tastes as pure as the Busselton water. It is not treated with Chlorine, infact it is not treated at all, and there have never been any issues. The water is regularly tested for bacteria and chemicals. If Napier (far bigger than BSN), does not need to treat the water, then why does Busselton? Check out the following web page for all the facts http://www.napier.govt.nz/index.p hp?pid=310
Posted by Kiwi, 15/03/2010 9:50:23 AM, on Busselton Dunsborough Mail
As soon as the Busselton Water letter arrived in the mail I knew that the neesayers would be out in full force, a new band wagon for them to jump on. The hurdles that this community has to jump through for progress due to diehard resistance is ridiculous. These are the same fools who as soon as high levels of toxins are found in the water will be questioning why something wasnt done about it sooner. I'm so glad I dont get the paper home delivered anymore. Harden up Busselton and get over yourselves.
Posted by Bob, 25/03/2010 4:02:35 PM, on Busselton Dunsborough Mail
If it is the pipes that are needing chlorine and not the water why flush the water every second or third month with chlorine telling residents when this is to happen, also if the water board is concerned about the length of pipes in Busselton's network why not set up a second UV filtration system at the middle of the extended network so that the water gets anotherUV treatment this may cover any nasty micro organisms and may be a cheaper option than pumping litre's of chlorine down the pipes every day for the rest of Busselton's future ! I have only just had a quick read of what chlorine is about so I am no scientist . Im sagainst chlorine in the water ,but I do see the reason for it but there has to be another way and there seems to be ways out there as to not use chlorine full-time in the system. Some light reading can be found here. http://www.internethealthlibrary. com/Environmental-Health/Chlorine -and-cancer.htm
Posted by Nigel Guy, 1/04/2010 12:58:27 AM, on Busselton Dunsborough Mail

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you agree with the chlorination of Busselton's water?

Yes
(21%)

No
(79%)

Total Votes: 119
Poll Date: 10 March, 2010

Most popular articles




 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...